Friday, October 18, 2013
Rob's Rants, Week 7: Missed Deadlines, World Travel, and the Monkey in the Middle
Hey guys, what's happening? I'm doing well, thank you. What's that? Hoping for a WNQ last week? Well have I the story for you.
But not really. The reality of the situation is that I've been traveling since last Saturday and been kind of off the grid, despite being actively on the grid in the heart of Seattle. This, combined with the fact that I'm still tied to the antiquated idea of a desktop computer, has negatively affected my productivity. Luckily, I have an iPad and free airport wifi on my way from Seattle to Chicago for Groin Wolf's wedding.
By the way, wouldn't it be awesome/ridiculous if we used FF names to reference decidedly non-FF related events occurring in managers lives? "I can't wait to see Daughter of Diaper Money." "I partied in Vermont with the Trail of Tears." "I walked up the escalator and ran into The Bolshevik Revolution." I will now start trying to do this whenever possible.
I had originally planned to use this week to do a playoff chances breakdown, but that has proven difficult. We have four 2-4 teams and five 3-3 teams, not to mention the two 4-2 teams. We have no undefeated teams, and the cream of the crop so far, Peter, plays 4-2 Dane, which will either a) pull him back to the pack or, more likely, b) mark Dane's descent into the Monkey in the Middle, ie, the apocalyptic logjam of average teams that will continue to eat each other alive until only a few survive.
I'm going to save the brunt of my wordsmithing for next week, when I've, you know, got a computer and can look at my history logs and stat sheets. For now, a few thoughts...
While I'd prefer to forget a Week 5 that marked my defeat at the hands of Jewish Malificent, I would like to highlight the Kim/Scott game. Kim, a consensus worst 3-3 team, beat Scott, barely, 76.9 to 76.1. This one week after Scott converted a loss to a win once score checking had been completed by ESPN.com. Two games with the score deided by less than a point! Without fractional scores, those could have both been ties. Scott would be 1-3-2 and would have more ties than wins.
I've been trying to change my team name to somehow mock/oppose the team I am playing on any giving week, leading to such classic match ups as "Team Pausegate vs The Unpauser," and "Bolshevik Revolution vs Tsar Romanov." I struggled when facing the poorly named 'My Team,' presuming that the opposite of My Team was Your Team. Peter, however, correctly pointed out that the opposite of My Team (Travis) would actually be 'My Team' (Rob). This as genius. This led to a match up of My Team (2-3) with My Team (2-3), which, of course, led to a My Team victory. This week, in an ode to the league, I've decided to go with Ryda top, Drew bottom, which I figured would only be fitting on Drew's wedding weekend. My second choice w Undescended Ballers.
Is Jason's team suddenly competent? After an 0-4 start he has pulled out two impressive victories. I would hold off on this assessment. Jason is being carried, almost single-handedly by he KC defense. Last week they put up 26 points, which is really not atypical of their production this season. I am tempted, however, to believe that this level of productivity is unsustainable, and am not sure Jason can rise above. Without his defense, Jason scored 72 points last week.
The Case of Dane: while he is nowhere near as terrible as I assumed he would be, the cracks are beginning to show. As noted, Dane has a team more shallow than a bathtub. With players on bye, this becomes more apparent, forcing him to start players like B Powell from NYJ (whose first name I'm not sure of), and others. This will only worsen with the demise of Julio Jones. But hey, he got another 13.5 points from the bench for RG3! A great investment!
As mentioned, my goal is to avoid much prognosticating for the playoffs until next week. But I will say a few things. Believe it or not, I have the #2 scoring offense. I also have the #3 most PA, hence my 3-3 record. Peter has the unusual combo of most PF and least PA; here is an example of a good team that is also getting really, really lucky. Drew and Kim are both 3-3 with PF of 528 and 498, respectively. The 2-4 teams: Kyle (561), Scott (551), Travis (541), Jason (540). Either Kim/Drew start scoring more, or they won't be .500 for long.
I'll be back for more (much more) next week. Until then, I'll leave you with this link to what NFL logos would look like if all the teams were British:
http://daveartlocker.blogspot.com/2013/02/what-if-all-nfl-logos-were-british.html
Be prepared for monocles, top hats, and team names like "Stripey Wotsits."
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
Something Random
Week 5 WNQ is below. Scroll down if you want to see it. I stumbled upon something awesome, though.
Blogspot keeps track of how viewers get to your page. The majority of people come from the site itself (since that is what is embedded in the FF website).
I also get page views from google. This would be understandable. If you type in "Bob fantasy football WNQ" I'm like the first dozen hits. There's another site called "vampirestat.com"that is some sort of domain appraisal service. I'm not sure how I fit into this, but multiple people have found this website through that. Bizarre. I'm guessing it is all people trying to found Wes Welker fan sites.
Finally, I have one hit from the google search "funny fantasy lm notes." ('lm' being league manager, of course). I googled this and didn't find me in the first few pages and gave up. The google overlords, though, are officially tracking our league's progress, and will undoubtedly use this all against us at some point in the future.
Blogspot keeps track of how viewers get to your page. The majority of people come from the site itself (since that is what is embedded in the FF website).
I also get page views from google. This would be understandable. If you type in "Bob fantasy football WNQ" I'm like the first dozen hits. There's another site called "vampirestat.com"that is some sort of domain appraisal service. I'm not sure how I fit into this, but multiple people have found this website through that. Bizarre. I'm guessing it is all people trying to found Wes Welker fan sites.
Finally, I have one hit from the google search "funny fantasy lm notes." ('lm' being league manager, of course). I googled this and didn't find me in the first few pages and gave up. The google overlords, though, are officially tracking our league's progress, and will undoubtedly use this all against us at some point in the future.
WNQ 5: The Times They Are A Changing
Week 5 WNQ:
Name Crisis
I’m currently reevaluting my options for the name “Wednesday
Night Quarterback.” I am displeased with this name for multiple reasons. Well,
really, two reasons. First, it is a rip off of Tuesday Morning Quarterback,
which is both better funded and better written. I don’t like inviting the
comparison. Second, it never comes out on Wednesday, so it seems like a
misnomer that must be corrected.
I’ve tried to come up with other ideas, but I’m currently
stymied. If inspiration hits me, however, the name WNQ will be unceremoniously
retired and replaced by whatever this bigger, better name is.
A Roundup of Things I
Find Interesting
I’m over the days of trying to be equitable and give each
team a moment in the spotlight. If you want a recap of each and every fantasy
game, you can go to the scoreboard and peruse the facts. I’ve decided to focus,
instead, on things I can judge more subjectively.
First, a scoring trend. Here is a list demonstrating the
number of 100+ point games had during a given week.
It’s truly astonishing (and, perhaps, either a testament to
manager play or the NFL itself) when over half the teams in the league score
over 100 points. This, unfortunately,
also leads to some unlucky losers.
In the Russian Revolution Classic, the reds steamrolled the
Romanovs’ and executed their entire family 133.9 to 110.1. With the third
highest score of the week, I’m disappointed to suffer a loss, but pleased that
my team isn’t entirely hopeless. Anastasia is still alive, I say! There is
still hope for the Romanov Dynasty!
Also a victim of this curse: Scott Baker, losing 106.4 to
105.3 to Drew. Fun Fact: Scott hasn’t scored less than 94 points this entire
season, but is the unproud honor of a 1-3 record. Only a run in with the resident
bottom feeder prevented him from starting with an 0-4 record.
This is somewhat insane. Peter has done some numbers work
(which I won’t get into…that’s for another day) that looks at the magic number
of points that suggest a win, in our league, specifically, is 88. Scott has
bested this number every week and has only one win to show for it.
I think part of this is because of the change in scoring, I
postulated that the max possible rise in score (assuming every player ended up
with an extra “0.9” at the end of a game would be 6.3 points (which would put a
winning score to be more along the lines of 94 points – the TMR postulate).
This would be true if, in fact, a QB only ever threw the football, and never
rushed. Or if a RB never caught a pass.
In fact, with the possibility of multiple category overlap,
this number explodes. Even if you assume that each player only has two
categories (passing/rushing for each QB, rushing/receiving for WR/RB/TE), that
still leads to a maximum increase in points of 12.6 each week. While this is an
unlikely number to obtained, it would not be unreasonable to expect and average
of 0.5 more points per week from each QB/RB/WR/TE in their designated main
specialty, and perhaps a similar amount in rushing/receiving/whatever. The
numbers then quickly spiral out of control. Think about it. If Michael Vick
threw for 223 yards and rushed for 79 yards last year, he would end up with 15
points. This year, he would end up with 16.8. 1.8 more points!
Suffice to say, we are in for a scoring bonanza this year,
and records will fall. Look at it this way: of the seven teams who scored over
100 points last week. At least two would have been under 100 without the
fractional points added by their starters…and that’s not even including the other
fractional points hidden within their stats!
Despite this, neither Kim nor Dane could manage to break 81
points. I would mock them more, but I have bigger fish to fry.
Jewish Malificent is
Dead. Long Live Jewish Malificent
Jason is 0-4. You read that right. Is his season over? I’ve
pondered this.
I have neither the time nor resources to scan the league for
any 0-4 starts leading to a playoff appearance. I have to imagine that the
occurrences area zero number. The chance of Jason rising from the ashes is not
impossible, but it is looking quite poor.
First, let’s look at this objectively. Jason is the second
lowest scoring team in the league (right ahead of Kim. Woohoo!). While he does
have a pretty astronomical PA (441.3, second highest in the league), he is
averaging about 27 points less than his opponent scores every week. The average
Jason opponent is scoring 110 points each week, in the face of a mere 83 from
Jason. However, saying Jason scores 83 points per game would be a boldfaced
lie. Let’s look at the numbers...
Week 1: 108.8
Week 2: 88.9
Week 3: 66.7
Week 4: 67
Week 1: 108.8
Week 2: 88.9
Week 3: 66.7
Week 4: 67
Jason is not a hit or miss team; he’s a team in decline. I
suppose you could say that, based on this data, Jason has settled into a steady
state of 67 points per game, which, as his current opponent, suits me just
fine.
Where did Jason go wrong? A few postulates.
1) Quarterback woes
Jason (along with Travis) was the victim of the great QB
rush of the early draft. Jason likely (and rightfully) postulated that he would
be stuck with no worse than Tony Romo, the 12th back QB in the draft.
He could not have anticipated, however, the fact that Dane would take both
Aaron Rodgers and RG III, or that Donel would decide he wanted every midrange
QB for his own. This left Jason with the dregs: this week Sam Bradford put up a
weak 7.7 points for him. Both Bradford and Schaub (Jason’s other QB) are
inconsistent QBs. They have the possibility of putting up the type of numbers
every top 10 QB puts up on a weekly basis, but rarely much more. They also have
the possibility of sucking.
2) Injuries
Steven Jackson’s thigh injury hurts the most, but lets not
forget that the majority of Jason’s players are banged up and at risk for a
meltdown
3) Lack of depth
Sure, there is Fred Jackson, Calvin Johnson, and
(theoretically) MJD. But the rest of Jason’s team? Scrub RBs R’ Us (Jordan
Todman? Daryl Richardson?), Aaron Dobson
(New England’s #12 WR), and a NYG TE (The Giants are the new Browns: do not
start). There’s not much he has to fall back on, and in a busy league, there
aren’t many players to pick up. Couple this with the Anti-Jason FAA laws, and
its going to be a long, long season.
The worst overall part? Jason’s got the #1 D/ST in the
league. What a waste! I’ll trade you another scrub RB for them.
Records and Shit
Congratulations to Kyle’s Tony Gonzalez: #2 TE with 26.9
points this week.
Has anyone noticed how TEs seem to be blowing up this year?
Already we have three of the top ten performances by TEs in our league filled,
and it’s week 4. This is not to mention both Donel and Ryan G having an
additional play fall within one point of the top 10. It’s a TE renaissance…and
there isn’t even Rob Gronkowski
Horrorscopes
Kyle: Bad luck will soon turn around. You’ve got all the
pieces to a successful puzzle, they’ve just decided to underperform. Believe in
LeSean McCoy and you shall be saved.
Scott: Make peace with those you have wronged, and appease
the Shiva, or you shall be cursed forever. Your lucky color is Fuschia.
Ryan Good: You won’t get to play Jason every week, so aspire
for more. Also, fear Native Americans. They hunt you while you sleep.
Rob: You will be rewarded for your struggles with a cupcake.
His name is Jason.
Ryan Davis: A wise commissioner will always help you out
with rules questions. A gift might go a long way. He likes whiskey.
Peter: World domination will soon be yours. Communism is the
way of the future. Вы - хуже всего.
Donel: Second place? How did you get there? What devil are
you worshipping? Can you have him call me?
Jason: Eventually, everybody loses. Even you. Avoid stock
markets and busy streets. It’s your time.
Dane: The end is nigh. Repent.
Travis: I don’t care how many times you say it: Rob
Gronkowski is not saving your season.
Drew: The universe does not understand your fantasy football
name. Is it alone? Does anyone get the reference?
Kim: There’s always Fantasy Baseball, right?
And Now For Something Completely Different
Two videos and one sentence:
Remember "The Fox" video I showed you all? It just became a Top 10 hit.
Thursday, September 26, 2013
WNQ Week 4: Trades and Ennui
Commissioner’s
Corner: Taste the Tears
This happens to me every year.
No, not losing, or looking mighty terrible. Those things
also happen to me every year, but that’s inevitable. Even the best teams (even
Travis, Season Two Edition) have their bad weeks. Perhaps not this
bad, but still, it happens.
I’m talking about Loser’s Ennui. This happens to me every
year when my team starts looking horrible. It’s not that I lose interest in my
team, it’s that it becomes harder and harder to write WNQ.
I think it’s two parts depression and one part hypocrisy. As
my energy level wanes from the sheer hopeless of my season (and you will know
my hopelessness to be at 100% whenever I play any Denver RB), I begin thinking,
“who cares if WNQ is on time. The end is nigh.” I also begin questioning
whether or not I can find anything relevant to say, and if I have a leg to
stand on when criticizing others because, lets face it, I’m bad. Not, like,
Jason bad. But still not good.
My resolution to all of you is that I will not succumb to
the Ennui of being a mediocre team struggling to make the 6th playoff
spot so I can lose to Scott or Drew in the first round. I shall persevere.
Taste the Happy, people.
And suddenly,
piercing through the dark clouds, a ray of hope: a Trade.
We have never been a trader’s league. I’m not sure what the
reason for this is. I think we’re all naturally suspicious of each other, and
all a little bit too bright to ever pull a fast one on anyone else. I’m fairly
confident that my Season 1-4 trend of being the Trader of Doom also did not
help make anyone confident in using the trade as a viable option to build a
team.
However, I do think we are primed this year for trading. I
know, I say this every year and it never happens, but I’m serious. The reasons
are multiple. First and foremost, a 12-man league means fewer available players,
thus necessitating trades. This is not new for this year, but still needs to be
mentioned. Second, our league has turned into a free-for-all. Traditional
powerhouses WASPs Limited and Jews of Evil are sitting 0-3 and are in desperate
need of some life. Finally, with the fact that every waiver wire transaction
will necessitate a $1 expenditure, trading is the only real means of a “free”
player.
Whether or not this will lead to more trades is yet to be
seen. However, this week we have our first team to team transaction: Travis is
trading off DeAngelo Williams and Giovani Bernard for Andrew Luck and Pierre
Garcon.
Let’s analyze, shall we? This is a no-brainer for Travis.
Andrew Luck is performing well and while certainly not a sure thing Top-10 QB,
he’s leagues better than the Has Been Gingers Travis has been relying upon. Pierre Garcon is a monster and will likely be
a strong, consistent WR for Travis to rely upon.
I would say Donel had the worst end of the trade, but just
take a look at this team. Donel played the, like, 8th string Seattle
RB last week because the only other RBs on his team were DeMarco Murray and an
injured Ray Rice. Donel’s RB situation is dire. While I don’t personally like
DeAngelo Williams (see for reference: every year ever), I think Giovani Bernard
has been playing well and might end up being a great RB. This trade seems like
a win-win for the teams involved, but a lose-lose to all those teams like me
hoping Travis finished 0-13.
And the performer of
the week is…Jordan Cameron
WTF?
#4 TE performance in our league ever. Who is this guy?
And now a video for
your viewing pleasure…
Thanks to Scott for this one…I think this sums up most of
our attitudes around the league.
I refuse to rank anyone this week, because all and all we were a pretty disappointing bunch. We had one team over 100 points, two of our league's top franchises drop to 0-3, and Peter won a game with 74.7 points (add that to your "luck" index). A few thoughts:
Drew and Dane really did play the game of the week with their nailbiter. Neither team looked very overall-good (Drew had two players under 1 point), but both have a number of playmakers able to get the job done. I maintain that Dane is itching for implosion with his lack of depth, but the Burleson injury can only have helped his WR corp...
Jason's maximum predicted score this week: 79. Officially the worst team?
Thursday, September 19, 2013
WNQ Week 3: The Fall of Travis, Dane Stands Alone, and Other Stories
Oh, woe is me.
I know what you’re saying. “Woe my ass, 2-0 punk ass bitch.”
It’s true. What do I really have to complain about? Despite an underwhelming
Week 2 (more on that later), I’ve for the luxury of being 2-0, which, in our
unpredictable, topsy-turvy league, is nothing to complain about. But I will
complain, and I will woe. Because my RB1 just got traded.
I ask the lot of you to tell me: do you remember a time when
such a high profile fantasy player was traded midseason? I certainly cannot.
I’m not even sure I was entirely aware that trades happened during the season
itself. There’s actually a 2008 ESPN article about
the lack of NFL trades that itself asks the question as to why more do not
occur. In case you are wondering, the article doesn’t answer the question.
So what is a fantasy owner to do? I’ll admit, Trent
Richardson as a Colt is 1000x better than Trent Richardson as a Brown. I was
already violating my own rule of Never-Start-Cleveland-Offensive-Players-Ever
by drafting him, and he has constantly been giving me headaches due to his
underperformance. While he might end up just not being that great, he’s much
greater in Indianapolis than in Cleveland. The question that vexes me, however,
is more immediate: will he be greater this
week? On three days notice?
Sigh. Woe is me.
Quick Takeaways: Week
2
Rob (84.1) vs Kyle (62.9)
As I said before, you can’t complain about 2-0, even when
the winning team (me) has only the 9th highest score of the week.
Credit Matt Ryan’s 23 points for me with helping…except if you reduced that
number to “3” I would have still won. The real credit for this goes to Kyle,
who manages anemic contributions across the board, including a fantastic -1
from his kicker. Now that’s a record.
Ryan/B (114.2) vs Scott (94)
Another week, another pretty decent performance by Scott
that ends in a loss. I haven’t been shy in my opinions of his RBs, and while
Lamar Miller played “better” (he didn’t have much room to get worse), David
Wilson laid a big old egg labeled “1.7,” and Reggie Bush came back to earth.
The biggest problem is that Scott doesn’t have much else on his bench, RB wise,
that could help him, either…unless you’re in love with Chris Ivory. He does
have three tight ends, though! Because that’s what every team needs.
Peter (111) vs Ryan/A (78.9)
I’m beginning to question whether my Ryan/A and /B
categorization switch last year was premature. Ryan/B is coming off of a
rebound win after his disastrous week of honeymoon ennui, while Ryan/A looks
pretty abysmal. Red Ryan has four RBs on his roster. On the positive side, two
of these players are Jamaal Charles and Arian Foster, both of whom are playing
good not amazing. On the negative side, he’s got them backed up with LeVeon
Bell and Mikel Leshoure, who combined for a stellar zero points last week.
Ryan/A is one ACL tear away from total collapse. Things are looking ugly in
Gingerville. Peter continues to impress, though I still hate him.
Dane (114.8) vs. Jewish Malificent (88.9)
I maintain that Dane’s team is unbalanced, top heavy, and
will be subject to total collapse if any of his key starters suffer the big
one. I’m not positive what ‘the big one’ refers to in this analogy, but I’m
going to go with “Peyton-Manning-level-C-spine-injury.” That being said, he is
playing pretty darn well with what he has. Aaron Rodgers continues to put both
A and a in Amazing. I must point out (and will continue to point out) that
RGIII continues to be the most expensive unnecessary backup ever. Jason,
meanwhile, has built a team on the back of a couple of WRs and a sea of
marginal QBs. In an odd twist of fate, his bench outscored his team by 0.1
points this week.
Kim (108.1) vs. WASPs (91.7)
What wrath have I brought to the House of Langley? A mere
two weeks after predicting this to be the Worst Season Ever for our Gentleman
of Southern Society™, he is 0-2 and just suffered a loss to Kim—perhaps the
biggest indignity imaginable. It’s not
that his team is awful, it is simply…disappointing. Where to start? Is it the
use of Carson Palmer vs. Andy Dalton as a QB1 (paging Dr. Langley, RGIII paging
Dr. Langley on line Trade-Me)? The lineup of consistently underachieving RBs
(tell me any of you love Matt Forte and Chris Johnson. I dare you)? Or the
young RBs fighting for playing time? Travis: you may say that things will look
up when Le Gronk returns, but I’m not so sure. Footnote: Kim, damn. Three
players under 1 point and you still manage 108 points? With three bench players
with 9 or more points (non-QB). Damn.
Donel (92.5) vs Drew (terrible)
From Week 1 to Week 2, Drew somehow managed to hemorrhage 40
points from his total score, and suddenly looks like the worst team in the
league. To the chalkboard! Let us analyze zee data!
To start off, Drew had the unfortunate luck of having his
players generally underachieve (it happens to the best of us, buddy). Drew
Brees was down 8 points from 20.5 last week, and his kicker manage a mighty
zero points. But there are some deeper problems. First, Drew’s RBs have simply
been underperforming. I don’t imagine Alfred Morris will continue to be
this…mediocre, but he’s not looking as l33t as he was last year. In regard to
the other options Drew is facing, I don’t think many people get jazzed bout
Ryan Mathews, Mark Ingram, Danny Woodhead, or (shudder) Donald Brown. Last week
Drew coasted on his WRs, but as we all know, WRs are not to be trusted, and in
a down week he suffered. As a sidenote, his tight ends suck balls. Congrats to Donel
for a bit of a rebound week, but let’s not get too excited: five out of the
seven people on Donel’s bench would have been better choices for starter than
the men he fielded. While this can’t be considered his fault (I wouldn’t start
Luck over Brady), it bodes ill if this trend continues.
Don’t Cry For Me,
Scott and Jason (The Truth is, I Never Left You)
We are currently sitting in a very well-distributed league.
We have four undefeated team, four winless teams, and four who have split. This
will end this week, as no undefeated teams play each other, but all of the
bottom feeders find themselves in a face off to ascend from last place.
I have some thoughts on these loser teams, and it’s not all
negative: I believe Jason and Scott are, at this point, ultimately fine.
Now, I realize 0-2 is never a spot where anyone wants to be.
However, lets look at the PF, which is a better indicator of how good a team
will be in the long run than a early season record. Both Scott and Jason are
averaging above the coveted 94 points per game threshold that predicts a 95%
chance of a postseason berth. Combined with the undefeateds (myself, Donel,
Dane, and Peter) and Kyle, only seve teams are currently above this marker, and
thus look to be the, theoretically, strongest teams in the league. Jason and
Scott have had 239.5 and 231.3 points scored against them, respectively, and it
is unreasonable to assume such numbers will continue (though not impossible.
See: every season Peter played from 2008-2011). As things average out, they
should rise to the top.
Who should worry? I worry about Drew, because he has the
league’s worst PF. I’m willing to chalk this up to aberrant data from a small
sample size, and give him a pass for now. My biggest concerns beyond that,
then, are Team WASP, and Ryan/A.
Let’s be frank. Both Travis and Ryan Davis have had a ton of
points scored against them (with Ryan/A leading the way with 256.9 PA).
However, unlike their counterparts in the Losers’ Sweepstakes, they haven’t
proved they’d be able to put up the points to match just about anyone. Their
offenses have been surprisingly anemic, and in the absence of a quick turn
around, they are threatening to be the worst teams in the league. Luckily, one
of them will manage a win this week, as they play each other in the Worst Game
of the Week.
Power Rankings: Week
2
1) Peter Emiley (Last week: 1)
FML. Peter has 268 PF, 50 more than his closest competitor.
After his monstrous Week 1, he comes back with a Week 2 performance that
screams, “I ain’t no joke. Respect me.” His front seven are so damn good that
even a 3 from Frank Gore barely affects him. I’m baffled, because I hate most
of Peter’s players, but as of right now he is getting results and will not be
ignored.
2) Humble Pie (Last week: Unranked)
A few things for me to regret: ranking Kyle #2 last week
(and so the descent begins!), praising the Philadelphia offense (I hate them
all) and the NE second-stringers (I hate them all). Also, disrespecting Dane,
but I won’t take that back. I will persevere!
3) Dane’s team logo (Last week: Unranked)
Because it’s amazing. Runner up: Jason’s.
4) Comebacks (Last week: Unranked)
From the dregs of society last week to the penthouse this
week, Ryan Good and Kim have proven they won’t just roll over and die already.
The season is early, and both of them could make playoffs pushes. Ryan/B is a
notoriously every-other-year team, and this is designated to be one of his
hotspots. Kim has been steadily improving over the course of the past two
seasons. Can she capitalize?
5) Underachieving (Last week: Unranked)
Thanks for the win, Kyle. Next time we play it’ll be my turn
for the meltdown
6) Our living FAA Experiment
With the Jason Rule now officially in effect, I am very,
very interested to see what becomes of the FAA and how players choose to spend
their money. We haven’t had a ton of action until this week, but suddenly
everyone is going for it. Peter leads the list with $26 for James Starks, just
the worst RB ever. I feel like James Starks is picked up for $25-80 every year
when the qualified RB in front of him gets injured, then shows exactly why he’s
a backup. Usually to the tune of 2 yards on forty carries. With eight fumbles.
Ryan/B picks up Eddie Royal for $22 (just two more than the
next highest offer, good job to you sir), who has no chance of continuing to
catch TDs at his current prolific rate and is destined to be a disappointment.
The bizarrely named Groin Wolf adds some TE I’ve never head of for $7, while
Scott makes the half-wise (new potential starting RB yea) half-stupid (he’s
terrible) decision to pick up Willis McGahee. And as further signs of the
apocalypse, Travis picks up Alex Smith for his QB.
I am wondering if anyone will hit that critical $0 during
the season and thus prevent themselves from obtaining players. Under the right
circumstances (a bye week or injury), this could be a total disaster…or it
might be a nonissue. It has certainly changed spending. We have yet to see the
rise of Makin’ It Rain Jason, which by this point last year had spent $84 on
players he would never use. This week he
spent $3. Congrats, owners, you’ve officially ruined Jason’s life.
7) Score bumps
Peter and I discussed this via text message this week. While
scores seem to be up quite a bit this season (thus far…though it always seems
like the beginning of the season is more explosive), after some very simple
reasoning, we realized the fractional points have nothing to do with it.
Think about it; there are only seven active players that
have fractional points. In the max situation, each would get an extra 0.9
points with fractional scoring, equaling just 6.3 points. An average sum would
seem to be a rise of 3.5 points (or 0.5 per player).
While seemingly insignificant week to week, this might
potentially play havoc on our highest point seasons. A 6.3 point addition per
week would equal 81.9 points total, a significant jump. Even just 3.5 per week
would lead to 45.5 points. We might be entering a new renaissance, similar to
our Year One fiasco of the 6 point QB TDs.
8) Michigan Football (Last Week: 4)
Last weekend notwithstanding, of course. For any of you who
will be in the Michigan area during Thanksgiving, Lori and I will be heading up
there for some Ohio State madness. I can’t promise we’ll be shelling out the kidney
required to get tickets, but copious beer pong and tailgating will occur. I
hope some of you will be around.
9) and 10) A General Sense of Ennui
My internet is broken and I’m running out of things to talk
about. Let’s just call it a week, shall we? It is already Thursday night, after
all.
Records
After a record-breaking Week 1, we’ve got just one record
this week: Jimmy Graham’s 23.9 TE points for Ryan/B puts him at #6 on the TE
All Time Chart. This also bumps Vernon Davis’ Week 1 performance for Donel from
the list. Better luck next time.
Next Week: Rob gets ATT Uverse (hopefully) and regains the
use of the internet.
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
WNQ Week 2: Peter Emiley Rises
And It All Comes
Crashing Back Down To Reality
I mentioned last week how the possibilities really do seem
infinite before the first week of NFL football. No matter who was drafted, how
much a manager prepared (or didn’t prepare), no matter how much shit talking
occurred between the draft and the first games, every owner could convince
him/herself that the right decisions had been made.
It’s a bit like having a child (or so I imagine). When your
team is first drafted, fresh and glistening with vernix, it is perfect. It’s
never talked back, insulted you, or failed to live up to your expectations. In
this analogy, Week 1 represents the terrible 2s. Suddenly, that perfect child
has learned the very human attributes of selfishness, self-centeredness, and
unquenchable rage. The happy, sleepy baby has given way to a hungry, angsty
monster, who would very much like a piece of chocolate right now before it
freaks out in the middle of the supermarket.
Strangely enough, I would dare say that things did not go as
planned during Week 1. Oh sure, Drew dispatched another victim in his annual
quest to have the best regular season record. But after that, we saw the return
of Scott Baker (sort of), an undefeated Dane, the fall of Jewish Malificent,
and the 140+ point rises of Kyle (Exclamation Point!) and Peter
(Interrobang?!). I have much to say about this, so lets do this.
Power Rankings: Week
1
1) Peter Emiley
Really? This guy is in first?
I’m not even going to bother talking about Kim, because she
was never really in contention for this game, and if you take out Anquan
Boldin’s 26.8 points, she was positively wretched all around. Let’s talk about
Peter.
158.2 points. That’s the most Peter has ever had (outside of
the inflated Year 1 scores) and after many years of drowning in FF ineptitude,
he has finally emerged on the other side of the tunnel (for now). With four
players posting scores of 20+, it would be hard for him to not win, but he
actually only had a single person who scored less than ten points (Montee Ball
looks like quite the poor pickup as of this moment, doesn’t he?). Dios mio,
Peter. What happened to being unlucky*?
After a consensus good draft, Peter comes out of the gate
with a roar. I understand that it is hard to take too much information out of
one week of data (remember, Godin started 2-0 last year en route to his cosmic
flameout), but Peter earns the top spot in the power rankings this week.
Goodbye Bad Karma Peter, Hello Lenin.
*I had a conversation with Peter recently about how unlucky
he has been in FF. This includes years of losing, as well as one game where his
team put up 27 points (no joke. Look it up.). I’ve been saying for a couple of
season that he has had such dreadful luck for so long that it would be
impossible for him to sustain it, and at some point his teams would have to get
better. This isn’t your standard, “oh, my kicker missed and I lost the game,” or
“I forgot to play a defense” type of bad luck. This is, “I got four primary
cancers at once bad luck, then got hit by two buses at once. While walking to
my wife’s funeral. Also, both of the buses were driven by my children who had
to watch me die, slowly.”
2) Kyle Bohm
It seems odd to put a manager who scored 145.9 points
against one of last year’s best teams in the second spot, which is a testament
to how well Peter did. What a difference a year (and being able to make it to
the entire draft) makes, eh?
Peter and I had a lengthy text message discussion about how
it was “ridiculous” that I categorized certain QBs (Kaepernick in particular)
as QB1s despite less than one full season of data. In my defense, I made it
very clear I was only using the ESPN projected point totals to make my
decisions. Also in y defense, see Week 1, 49ers over GB, 34-28.
While I’m sure Kyle is smarting from his Packers’ defeat, he
can take solace in not only Kaepernick, but the dominance of AJ Green. Is he a
possible #1 overall WR? Maybe yes, maybe no, but Kyle is getting his moneys
worth. Add in Larry Fitzgerald (20 points) and his WR 3 on the bench (Brian
Hartline, 17.4), not to mension a variety of other very usuable WR options, and
I think he has the deepest WR corp in our league. And LeSean McCoy, well, that
gets me to my next point…
3) Michigan 41, Notre
Dame 30 – (And I Didn’t Even Get To Watch)
Sorry, Notre Dame fans, just because you keep losing doesn’t make it
not a rivalry.
I’d make fun of Ryan Davis, following the return to natural
order where Michigan dominated Notre Dame, but it’s almost too easy at this
point. Now that Michigan and Notre Dame will not be playing each other annually
(solely because of selfish, misguided political reasons) so that Notre Dame can
keep up their thrilling rivalry with Purdue, I’m glad Michigan showed them a
proper exit.
The resident on Ultrasound this week is a Notre Dame alum (I
know you can’t hear me saying the school name in my head, but when I talk about
Notre Dame negatively, I always use the French pronunciation, which makes them
sound more like sissies), as is my next-door neighbor. They’ve been talking
trash for weeks. I couldn’t be more
thrilled with this outcome.
Ironically, I missed most of the game (including Devin
Gardner’s epic TAINT) because I was the ringside physician for a local MMA
event. While it was fun, it probably sounds a little bit cooler than it is.
This was not UFC; it’s like one of the amateur leagues that
feeds some fighters into the pros. There were ten fights and only three of them
were (to use the nonsensical term the announcer used) “pro amateurs.” The other
seven were hilarious.
I’ve never been the type of guy who thought to myself, “you
know what would be fun? Doing an MMA fight in front of 500 people will little
to no forethought.” I didn’t know there were such people until Saturday. Of the
14 “amateur amateurs,” two of them didn’t have the endurance to actually fight,
and more or less laid around on the ground the whole time hoping to get knocked
out. One of them was about 5’ 10” and 130 pounds; tell me that doesn’t scream
fighter. Another one was wearing purple and pink sparkly nail polish.
Even better than the fighters were their ringside
assistants. I’m not sure exactly how (or why) someone gets into the business of
amateur MMA, but the ringside coaches/assistants/managers/sweat jockeys were
hilarious. Some of the fighters had huge entourages in matching clothes, with
big flags that said things like “The Jungle MMA,” or “America for Fighting.”
These managers were all forty-year old men living up their old glories by
helping kid gets the shit beat out of them. They also all still had mohawks.
For all the less organized fighters, it was like a
big-budget, awards-contender boxing movie. This one Puerto Rican kid had two
managers; a scrawny blond kid wearing a green Celtics jersey, and a fratty kid
with two popped polos and a baseball cap with the sticker still on. How did
these three people find each other? What are the motivations of support this
fighter who is now and will probably never make any money from this?
Watching these hilarious (and only mildly dangerous) fights
prevented me from seeing the game until about 0.4 seconds before Notre Dame
ended the game by throwing an interception. I had been following on my phone
beforehand, which is probably the most frustrating way to “watch” football.
I’ve since devoured the recaps, and wanted to get in one final “See you
losers,” before they’re gone forever.
Also, this
happened. FTW.
4) The Philadelphia
Eagles Offense
Did you see that fucking game? Chip Kelly looks like a
maniac and I love it. The Eagle ran like 33 plays in 3 minutes (or some other
ridiculous stat like that) and just bulldozed over the Redskins in the first
half. Ultimately, they got a little bit gassed and were less productive in the
second half, but shit, those players are legit, and will only get better as
they get used to the system. Case in point:
LeSean McCoy (Kyle) 24.9 points
Michael Vick (Ryan/B’s bench) 25.5 points
DeSean Jackson (Donel) 16.4 points
Brent Celek (Jewish Bench) 11.6 points
There are going to be some big numbers out of these guys,
mark my words. Also, fun fact: everyone who started an Eagles player won this
week (Kyle, Donel), and everyone who had one but did not start them (Ryan/B,
Jason, Scott) lost. Go Eagles.
5) Quiet Consistency
Both Donel and I put up big numbers this week (124.7 and
117.1 points, respectively), all without anyone blowing up. My top scorer of
the week failed to break 20 (Matt Ryan, 19.4),
while Donel had just one player over 17, Vernon Davis at 21.8. This
could, in certain circumstances, spell doom. However, both of us had the
benefit of calm, good performances from the majority of our players. Neither
Donel nor I had any true stinkers (Trent Richardson’s 7.7 wasn’t what I wanted,
but wasn’t a disaster, either), and generally have all of our players perform
at or above expectations.
TMR says that, in a standard 10 team league, you need about
94 points per week to make the playoffs, based on the data from standard ESPN
leagues. With 12 teams, that number will be different (though I’m not sure how
different. I presume lower because of the distribution of players, but then I
worry it might be higher due to more teams contending to playoff spots), but I
think it’s a good marker. Generally speaking, 94 points per week will get teams
to eight wins, on average, and 95% of teams with eight wins make the playoffs.
We might not be flashy, but watch out. Eight wins here we
come.
6) Peyton Manning
minus the rest of Scott’s team
Holy seven TDs, Batman.
Peyton Manning’s 46.3 points is enough for second place on the all time
top scoring QB list and third place overall. The only QB above him? Michael
Vick’s 49 points for Scott in Season 4. What a dominating performance. After
watching this game I said to myself, “Game Over.”
I know that a fantasy owner can’t meltdown, per say, given
that it’s not his fault the players who have no idea they are involved in his
life occasionally lay an egg. However, I’d be hard pressed to say I wasn’t
ultimately surprised, nay, shocked at the outcome of this game.
As you may recall, I was not big on Scott’s draft choices. I
specifically pointed out his RBs as quite the disastrous mess, and I predicted
they would potentially be his downfall down the line. And while I (temporarily)
stand corrected by Reggie “Screwing Fantasy Football Managers For Life” Bush, I
feel fairly vindicated by the other four RBs on Scott’s roster. Those four men
combined for a total of 2.9 points last week. His starting line up managed -1.1. You can only imagine how thrilled I was
to watch as David Wilson, Scott’s last player and only hope to beat me, fumbled
twice and was benched.
Expect Peyton’s manager to start calling Scott and requesting
a trade in the near future. He paid too much money for his robot C-spine to
spend much time on Scott’s squad.
7) Ryan Good’s honeymoon
Because it likely saved him from having to watch how
terrible his team is.
8) Dane’s only win
all year
Now, I might be exaggerating a bit. I still maintain Dane’s
team is terrible, but less us give credit where credit is due. I don’t care
what anyone says about my team if they win, and right now, Dane’s undefeated.
Sure, it’s against Ryan, but whatever. Let’s look at the positives:
Aaron Rodgers continues to be outstanding. Owen Daniels, one
of my all time favorite TEs, might be having a return to form, and put up 18.7
points.
Since this is a positive portion of the column, I’ll ignore
the piss poor performance of CJ Spiller, the absolute absence of any WR worth
squat besides Julio Jones, the wasted money that is RG III on the bench (who
didn’t even play that well), the league low bench score of 24.5, and the fact
that he has managed to have two players on his roster who are suspended.
So all in all, great job!
9) New England Second
Stringers
We all knew Tom Brady would be fine. I don’t think there was
ever much fear that he would continue to be a top fantasy threat, even with new
receivers. The FF analysts were riding high on Stevan Ridley, too, and we all
know Danny Amendola was billed as the next big thing. Oh, and Gronk will be
back soon, too.
I’m not faulting people for paying big money on those four
guys. What I’m saying is anyone who got 15.9 points out of Shane Vereen*,
picked up Julian Edelman off the waiver wire only to watch him become a 20
point monster, or watched Kenbrell Thompkins get targeted 14 times (though his
hands might be suspect) must be excited. Oh wait, I own all those players. Fuck
you guys.
*Of course, Shane Vereen had to go and break his wrist and
require surgery. That now puts me at two arm injures by the end of Week 1: Vereen and Andre Brown,
who I hear will return at some point in Week 10. This is likely my response to
Peter’s vicegrip on LE injuries. Hide your wrists and forearms, Matt Ryan. I’m
coming for you.
10) Ryan Davis’s team name
Russell Wilson’s War! Get it? It’s clever! I swear! Doesn’t
anyone else get it but me…?
A Conundrum: The Poor
Attending
As you (likely) all know, as an US Fellow, I’m technically
an attending. When I work in the emergency department, I oversee residents like
any of your attending physicians do. This translates to me spending less time
with patients and more time shaping/berating young minds to be more like me.
It’s pretty fun, and I recommend you all try it.
However, I’ve recently begun to notice that I fall into a
small segment of the “staff physician” world that I never knew existed: The
Poor Attending.
As an “attending” physician (I use quotations because I’m
really only half an attending, but for hospital administrative purposes, I’m
the real deal), I get a different badge than the residents (gone are the
“Resident” modifiers used to shame residents into submission), more free food,
and, importantly, the ability to park in the Physicians’ Parking Lot.
This is kind of a big deal. The resident parking lot is the
sixth floor of a parking structure that is across a busy street and the
entirety of the hospital from the emergency department. There are also so many
residents that, occasionally, this fills up, necessitating parking on the ninth
floor. The options to get out of the parking structure are a) a nine-story
stair commute or b) an elevator ride in an elevator that takes about five
minutes to arrive once called and is invariably 200 degrees Celsius. Also,
every fifth time you park in the lot, the Parking Lot Nazis drive up in their
golf cart and demand to see your credentials that allow you the privilege of
parking within ten blocks of the hospital.
The Physician lot is a floor-level structure with cool
indoor parking, located a brisk one-minute walk from the ED, with both the
cafeteria and a Starbucks directly in between. It is just about the best thing
to happen to humanity in Orlando since hurricane insurance.
I was recently walking through the Physician Lot, however,
and came about a realization: I drive the cheapest, rattiest vehicle in the
entire area. It’s like wall-to-wall BMWs in there, with a loyal section of
Lexus owners and the occasional family practice doc slumming it in an Audi. Not
only am I still driving Ford F-150, but she still has the scars from Rob vs.
Parking Garage, Ryan Good vs. Truck Turning Radius, Carissa vs. Competent
Driving, and Rob vs. The Distracted Teenager. I’ve got the cheapest vehicle by
a factor of $10,000, or more. For reference, my direct superior, the US
Director, alternates between a BMW SUV and a BMW Convertible.
I’ve witnessed people judge me when they walk by. They stare
of my truck and wonder, “who let this poor person in here?” I’ve never felt so
trashy. I never though I’d be one of those people who had to buy a new vehicle
when they got a new job, but it might happen. I wonder if BMW makes pickups…
Throwback: Ladies’
Bible Study
I was recently reading an article that made me suddenly nostalgiac for medical school. You’d think it would have to do with, I don’t know, the medical school, one of our classmates, Michigan football, or drinking. But no, it was nothing more than a t-shirt I saw online.
I was recently reading an article that made me suddenly nostalgiac for medical school. You’d think it would have to do with, I don’t know, the medical school, one of our classmates, Michigan football, or drinking. But no, it was nothing more than a t-shirt I saw online.
You too can make God proud as a Female Spambot.
I hope I am not the only one who remembers the epic
September 2006 email storm that momentarily crashed all of our umich email
accounts. Now, many of you know that I love a good email storm more than just
about anything (don’t tell my wife), so this is right up my alley. But to this
day, when I think of Ladies’ Bible Study, a smile forms on my face and my heart
swells to three times too large. It’s that perfect. I’d consider buying the
shirt if it wasn’t so damn bizarre without context.
For those of you who don’t remember it, or want to see a
collection of the most bizarre emails taken from the chain, I’ve got a link. I promise you will
both laugh and cry.
Dialectic Maps
Okay, so I’m not sure I’ve ever heard a less interesting
term than “dialectic maps,” but bear with me.
Recently, a grad student at NC State made a project
for his Ph.D. that mapped out the differences in how Americans pronounce
certain words or use variable terms to refer to the same thing. The most
instantly recognizable discrepancy has to be the “soda vs. pop vs. coke” issue
that has divided the nation for years. This project polled tons of people from
different locations on over a hundred of such topics and made these interesting
maps. As I mentioned, there’s a ton of them, but one in particular stood out to
me.
Niels: WTF?
I hope you can read that with the small font. Apparently, a
large enough group in the Alabama-Mississippi have a distinct term for when
rain falls when the sun is shining. They say, The Devil is beating his wife.” I
immediately saw this and loved America.
There’s all sorts of amazing stuff here, and I highly
recommend looking into it. I particularly like this one because “sunshowers”
(the term Floridians use for this) are essentially the number two weather
phenomena in the state of Florida, with number one of course being “Crippling
Heat with 1000% Humidity.” I was recently out and about and got caught in one
myself…
Curse you, The Devil.
I asked Niels and he says he doesn’t use the term. If any of
you know anyone who does, please let me know. Finding a user of this term has
become the new goal of my life.
And Now, One Random
Video
I texted Peter the link to this
video, and he immediately responded, “Did you just send me a virus via
YouTube?” I sent it to another friend of mine who said, “Is this a trick? I’m
not clicking on it.”
While I guess it’s good that everyone I know is vigilant
against cybercrimes, I’m sad that I can no longer send out links via text
message without people being suspicious.
This video is amazing and I refuse to give anything away by
talking about it more. Here’s some praise from others:
“Alright you win. That video was perfect.” – Peter Emiley,
M.D.
“Wow. Those guys do a significant amount of drugs. That was
amazing.” – Dan Bentley, M.D.
“It is not an exaggeration to say that that video changed my
life.” – Justin Zumsteg, M.D.
“The next Gangnam Style” – some random commenter on YouTube.
(If you think I’m making up those quotes, I’m not. It’s that
good.)
Now For Some Other
Fantasy Football Stuff
As mentioned previously, Peyton Manning now moves into the
#2 QB/#3 Overall spot. One other record has been broken…kind of.
Donel’s Vernon Davis moves into sole possession of #10 TE
with 21.8 points. I say kind of because, well, these fractional points are
fucking with everything. There was a four way tie in tenth with 21 points, and
now those are all technically erased…though any one of them could have had 21.8
points that we would never know about. I’m going to keep all player totals
before the scoring change as full numbers; all other scores will have a
trailing zero to signify if they in fact scored 20.0 points, as opposed of the
nebulous “20” of days old.
Finally, Peter’s score of 158.2, while not his best overall
score, it is the sixth best of all time, and the second best of the modern era.
Only Travis (159 points, Season 2) has ever done better without inflated QB and
D/ST scoring.
While not quite good enough for the all time best list, Kyle
officially notches his best score ever this week with 145.9 points.
Next Week, on WNQ
Probably less meandering stories that have nothing to do
with fantasy football. The return of the power rankings. My continued shock
about how terrible Ryan Good was this week.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




